| Mochlos archaeological sites. The Island and the mainland excavations |
|
It has uncovered a large segment of the Late Minoan town on the island, and it has located and excavated two important outposts of this town on the adjacent coastal plain. It has also opened 20 unplundered LM III chamber tombs which belong to the LM III settlement uncovered on the island. It has uncovered remains of four different civilizations: Byzantine, Hellenistic, Mycenaean, and Minoan.
The room could be entered through a doorway in its east wall and may have provided access to a rectangular bastion that projected from the south side of the room. All of the rooms in this section adjoined one another and, entered from the east, north or west, they formed a solid, unbroken line of wall on their south. The section of rooms to the east, which were also excavated by Seager, were arranged a little differently. They were set back behind a terrace wall or rampart that projected to the south leaving an open space between the buildings and the actual line of wall. A series of terraces lay in the space between these two building groups behind the same line of wall, and a wide staircase appears to have led up from one terrace to another, past an exedra on the third terrace, into the interior of the complex. Two of its rooms were provided with bench presses, the earliest examples known of this type of press; one was used to crush olives to make olive oil and the other to press wool, perhaps for the manufacture of felt. Further work is required before the Late Hellenistic period at Mochlos can be fully understood. At the moment there are several possible explanations for the remains which have been found here. The Ptolemies had been active keeping peace in the area since the 3rd century, and Patroklos, commander of the Ptolemaic forces in the Chremonidean War, established a garrison at nearby Itanos which the Ptolemies maintained well into the 2nd century. In the 2nd century they established another garrison at Leuke off the southeast coast of Crete and they may have felt a need to establish still a third as an additional base for their activities in eastern Crete and other operations in the Aegean. The city states of Hierapytna and Praisos who both claimed this area of Crete may also have attempted to secure the strategic harbor at Mochlos for themselves. In the middle of the 2nd century when war broke out between Praisos and Itanos, largely as a result of a dispute over the administration of the Shrine of Zeus Diktaios at Palaikastro, Praisos may have felt a need to secure its northern frontier; later after war broke out between Praisos and Hierapytna and Praisos was completely destroyed, Hierapytna took up the territorial claims of Praisos and pursued the war against Itanos. It might also have felt a need to secure the northern approach to the isthmus which led straight overland to the city. In 115 B.C. Hierapytna appealed directly to the Roman Senate to arbitrate its conflict with Itanos. It did so first through the mediation of itinerant justices from Magnesia on the Maeander, later through a Roman commission headed by Q. Fabius. In 112 the consul Calpurnius Piso was instructed to resolve the dispute and re-establish the border between Itanos and Hierapytna. Rome was now an active player in the area, but it may not have been until the next century that it actually required troops in the area. These actions, along with the reappearance of Cretan piracy, provoked the Senate to demand the conquest of the island. An initial foray sent out in 77 B.C. met with disaster, but in 68 the consul Q. Caecilius Metellus landed on the island with three legions. He undertook the complete subjugation of the island, conquering Cydonia in the west first, then moving east to destroy Knossos. The Cretan Aristion played a major role in the defense of the island and escaped to Hierapytna in 67 where he led the final resistance against the Romans. Hierapytna was the last city to fall, and while the details of Metellus's strategy in the conquest of the island are unknown, it is likely that he moved troops by land and by sea. To reach Hierapytna from Knossos, the easiest route would have taken him along the north coast of Crete to the isthmus of Hierapytna. Mochlos offered the best harbor at this point, and Metellus may well have established a camp here, or taken advantage of a pre-existing one, to support his troops in their march across the isthmus to Hierapytna. A second house, C.2, also partly excavated by Seager, has been uncovered to the north with two workshops in its basement rooms. The western side of the building, excavated by Seager, lies under Seager's dump which is not yet removed. When it is, the northwest corner of the house can then be drawn and added to the plan. Eleven successive floor levels, ranging in date from LM IB to MM III, have been uncovered along the south facade of the house, where a retaining wall was built to support an approach to the house. Their size and architectural details, their relative isolation, symbols of rank, including large numbers of gold diadems, found among the grave goods, and evidence for differential treatment of the deceased, all indicate that these tombs were reserved for a ruling elite. There is some reason to believe that they were family tombs and belonged to individuals who played a religious role in the community, in which case they may well have belonged to the chiefs of Prepalatial Mochlos. The smaller, more numerous tombs, including rock shelter and pithos burials (VII-XXIII and Alpha-Lambda), were located on the adjacent South Slope and were used by the population at large. Most of the built tombs were constructed at the beginning of the EM II phase (ca. 2900 BC) and continued in use in the EM III phase (ca. 2300 to 2000 BC); fewer appear to have been used in the MM IA phase (ca. 2000 to 1900 BC). After a considerable gap some were re-used in the Neopalatial period, and it was at this time that the pithos burials were made. In 1912 Seager published his discoveries in his Explorations in the Island of Mochlos. In it Seager concentrates on the small finds, since they include some of the most spectacular objects from anywhere in Early Bronze Age Crete, but he neglects the architecture of the tombs. In the early 1970's Professor Jeffrey S Soles drew detailed plans of the cemetery and identified all of the tombs that Seager had excavated. The results are published in The Prepalatial Cemeteries at Mochlos and Gournia and the House Tombs of Bronze Age Crete, Hesperia: Supplement XXIV, Princeton 1992.
The building served as a rural outpost of the main settlement on Mochlos, where its pottery was made, and its occupants took advantage of the natural resources at this end of the Mochlos coastal plain with its abundant water supply to engage in a number of different activities. If the main settlement on Mochlos is thought of as a second-order site, overseeing the neighboring coastal plain for a larger site or nearby palace, this farmhouse is a good example of a third-order site whose occupants were in some way attached to the settlement on Mochlos and looked to it for social recourse and other needs of a more practical nature. The reoccupation at Chalinomouri is not well-preserved since it lay near the modern surface and was itself badly eroded, especially along the western side of the house where the west wall has partly collapsed into the neighboring ravine. Evidence of this reoccupation was found in Room 1, but the best evidence to date was found in Room 4 where it was possible to identify an LM III floor at an elevation of +28.52-28.39 m. A new wall which rested in part on an earlier wall separating Room 4 from Room 5 was built along the south side of this room at this new floor level and blocked an earlier doorway at the southwest corner of the room; it is the only LM III wall in the whole building however. The LM IB floor in the room lay ca. 0.50 m. below this level. The intervening area was filled with earth and preserved no wall or roof debris from the LM IB building. A polished stone bead of serpentinite, which could have been manufactured in the house, was found in this fill. No LM III floor level was found in Room 5, but the later occupants of the building appear to have filled it with earth in a similar fashion to raise its original floor to a higher level. The LM IB floor in the room lay at an elevation of +28.12-28.06 m. and contained the remains of two piriform jars decorated with lilies, incised in the clay or applied in raised relief. The sarcophagi were usually painted more carefully with scenes related to the afterlife. Perhaps the most interesting was decorated on the inside of its rim with two small figures; one wearing an animal mask that resembles the head of a jackal has been interpreted as a god of the underworld, a psychopompos who like Hermes conducts the deceased to the afterworld. Another sarcophagus was decorated with a triglyph-metope frieze which could have come right off a Doric temple. Many of the burials were sufficiently complete, if only a few were still semi-articulated, that it has been possible to identify age, sex and physical abnormalities. Perhaps the most striking observation about the burials is that many of the tombs were used by male-female couples. In those containing two burials, one of the burials was made later than the other, and the tomb was clearly reopened and the earlier burial relocated. In one tomb the bones of the earlier burial were broken up and relocated in a large cylindrical pyxis, of the kind used to hold cremations in the 12th century. Elsewhere the couples were buried in adjacent tombs and in one of these, Tomb 15, a tunnel was cut between the chambers. Some tombs contained no skeletal material and may have been used as cenotaphs. Other tombs contained rich, luxury objects. A bronze bowl, covered with a bronze mirror, was located in one tomb it held a collection of jewelry, including a necklace of ivy-shaped faience beads, a gold signet ring and a bronze dress pin. Two seals were found with the burial in one sarcophagus, one decorated with a sphinx, the other with a lion munching the hindquarters of a deer. Bronze weapons were located in a few of the tombs. The mortuary variations in the cemetery reflect variations in the population at large and reflect the social stratification of the LM III population at Mochlos which is probably typical of the other Mycenaean settlements in the area. Source
|
| Last Updated on Saturday, 26 June 2010 16:51 |
Updated articles Category: Articles general The monastery of Agia Triada of Tzagarolon is one of the richest 0 Comments , 15 Hits Category: Articles general Europe's first advanced civilisation was local in origin and not 0 Comments , 24 Hits Category: Articles general From Minoan monuments to relics of the Second World War, a family 0 Comments , 38 Hits Category: Articles general The recent (12 April 2013) shooting of foreign workers, in 0 Comments , 48 Hits |
Most Read Category: Restaurant and Taverns in East Crete Palm Beach Vai in Palekastro, East Crete. Our purpose at Palm 0 Comments , 23929 Hits Category: Restaurant and Taverns in East Crete Welcome to The Lemon Tree, welcome to food heaven!We are a 16 Comments , 22351 Hits Category: Restaurant and Taverns in East Crete Taverna - Restaurant "Kalliotzina" in Makrigialos, Koutsouras, 7 Comments , 20538 Hits Category: Restaurant and Taverns in East Crete AMPELES tavern is located next to the AMBELES apartments 1 Comment , 20361 Hits |
Newest Articles Category: Articles general The monastery of Agia Triada of Tzagarolon is one of the richest and most... 0 Comments , 15 Hits Category: Articles general Europe's first advanced civilisation was local in origin and not imported... 0 Comments , 24 Hits Category: Articles general From Minoan monuments to relics of the Second World War, a family holiday... 0 Comments , 38 Hits Category: Articles general The recent (12 April 2013) shooting of foreign workers, in... 0 Comments , 48 Hits |
The Web Crete Directory
|
Latest Comments..
|